Michigan Technological University

Alumni Relations

PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 2

PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 2 - (Rated R for some profanity, brief & violent action):  Two earlier  pseudo-docs ("Blair Witch" & "Paranormal Activity 1") that cost next to nothing to make, but took in heaps at the box office, prompted the making of this, a kind of prequel to "Paranormal Activity 1."  And it's tops at the box office as well.

This time the home is in the suburbs of Carlsbad, California  - more spacious, more upscale fancy  with  wide open spaces for things to hide, a grand staircase, and outside a large curving pool; and instead of just a boy/girl involvement we have a typical upscale family including , a dog, a teenage girl  and her 3 year old brother.

The format  is similar to the original except that it begins with the home being totally trashed, but nothing taken.  A set of surveillance cameras are set up to cover every room in the house and the pool (with its  bottom-trawling  mechanical  cleaner that  sets off the first of a series of recorded incidents by crawling at night  to the pool's edge & with unaccountable volition leaps up onto the terraced floor.  Odd, but the family dismisses it as just-one-of-those-harmless freakish things.  Their first error.

Soon things  begin to go hum, rumble, slam & bump in the night.  The cameras record (normal  light by day, blue & grainy at night) each room 24/7 without serious  incident until the 10th night when a faint ominous rumbling at low volume suggests - what?  At first,  nothing.  Then an occasional crash or loud thump.  Then closet doors start banging,  a  kitchen pan becomes airborne while other  hanging  things  spin around.  By the 13th night the baby is found floating out of his crib & walking the floor on his own.  The police dog barks at some unknown thing,  then is bashed - the first fatality.

Checking the videos it is learned that such things could happen anytime day or night, but mostly  when  no one or just one person happened to be present.  The daughter slips into the garden to find out why the front door had banged open & shut, when the door slams behind her, locking her out.

By now all are hysterical, but they stand their ground & refuse to vacate.  That's when the violence really revs up.

According to director Tod Williams in an interview,  absolutely no script was used; the characters  meandered  haphazardly .  "We leapt into this thing  not really knowing which way we were going to go.  Didn't even know when or how we would end."  (Aha!  That accounts for the disturbingly abrupt ending that offers no closing explanation whatever.)   He also seemed loathe to direct the cast at all, as they ad-libbed to one another with the use of a home-owned, hand-shaky video camera -the dialog far from inspired:  " Uh, um, well, what do you think?  I mean, well,  you know, I thinkŠ"

Curiously, credits for a script  went to three people including  Oren Pell, responsible for the original  "Paranormal Activities  1."  A contradiction  here?

The overall effect?  Like the original, plenty of built-up suspense generated by the noises, heightened  by having to stare at an empty set for great lengths of time before the sounds would sneak in - giving us plenty of time to roam the set, picking up on details that might be important,  from  a change of things  on the couch to  what  might be lurking in dark corners.  Plenty of hair-raising  moments,  not only because of the mysterious  noises (which grew louder & more frequent as the film progressed), but because they could not be identified.

The movies with things that go bump in the night  are legion; the  gimmic k  in this  one, that the total story is never told, has a certain novelty to it that, with just one  more will  lose as old hat.  It was not a boring 89-minutes,  but what bothered me - aside from the many puzzling  comments  from the director  which conflicted with the closing credits and which, in a sense, said, "Ha ha, we fooled you, didn't we!"  I felt cheated for having been duped.  Other production problems include results from the set cameras being obviously edited, with  frequent jump cuts to eliminate  overly long uneventful  bits . The characters  reacted appropriately during the scary moments; otherwise they  were quite awkward, even clumsy, in their  improv  moments.

The movie won't win over anyone who wasn't won over by the original; this is merely  more-of-the-same, only better budgeted,  more expansive, more professionally created.  (Grade:  B-)

Office of Alumni Relations

Alumni House
1400 Townsend Drive
Houghton, MI 49931-1295

Ph. 906-487-2400
Fax: 906-487-3171
Toll-Free: 1-877-688-2586
Email: alumni@mtu.edu

Michigan Technological University

1400 Townsend Drive
Houghton, Michigan 49931-1295
906-487-1885

See a Problem?

Email the Webmaster